|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
The political calculus on the gun issue has changed
Submitted by:
jac
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Most gun control measures get broad public support, including requiring background checks for private and gun show sales (83 percent in a 2019 poll), a ban on the sale of high-capacity ammunition magazines (61 percent) and a ban on the sale of semi-automatic weapons (57 percent). But what matters politically is intensity of support. Getting gun laws through Congress has always been difficult because of single-issue voting by gun rights supporters.
The gun issue drives their votes; for most other voters, it doesn't.
Submitter's note: I'm a one issue voter. I figure that if someone is too dumb to understand gun rights, then they're likely to be just as stupid on other issues. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/6/2021)
|
"Getting gun laws through Congress has always been difficult because of single-issue voting by gun rights supporters."
Yeah, and that pesky Constitution and SCOTUS precedents keep getting in the way, too.
U.S. v. Miller: protects arms in common use that have militia utility.
D.C. v. Heller: The 2A protects and individual right to keep and bear arms unrelated to membership in a militia, and to use small arms for lawful purposes.
McDonald v. Chicago: The 14A binds the states to 2A protection.
But hey, that doesn't stop the statists from trying.
(Like files at a picnic...) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
