|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/14/2019)
|
| Test. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/14/2019)
|
"Some gun-rights activists would murder government officials who try to enforce a duly passed law."
No, they would attack a government and its officials who try to enforce a 'duly passed' UNCONTITUTIONAL law that promiscuously discards the Constitution's command that it may not do so.
That ain't 'murder'.
That would be The People exercising their DoI right to alter or abolish a government that deliberately defied its duty to secure their individual rights, and attempted to nullify those rights by force. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
