|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Targeting A Law That Protects The Gun Industry
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://inrigare.wordpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Bushmaster AR-15 semiautomatic rifle used to kill 20 Connecticut schoolchildren and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012 fired 154 rounds in about the time it takes to read this editorial. The weapon is a lethal beast, designed to inflict maximum casualties in combat — yet it is marketed to civilians who are more than likely not trained to handle it. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(4/18/2016)
|
| A firearm is a firearm is a firearm, looking scary does not change any thing, the civilian market has semi auto only, unless you have an ATF permission slip for fullauto. The military uses select fire. All of the bull the libtards vomit is just that!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
