|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: Gun Control Protesters Take to Times Square After Mass Shootings
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Marchers outraged by the latest mass shootings took to 42nd Street and brought their message to Times Square to announce that “enough is enough” when it comes to gun violence. “We have a powerful movement around this whole country that represents what a majority of Americans now believe,” said Dianne Rinaldo, a member of the New York City leadership team for Moms Demand Action. “That the NRA must be put aside, and we must vote for laws that will keep our communities safe and respect the second amendment.” |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(8/5/2019)
|
| No one wants to hear that over 100 people are killed "Every Day" in the United States from vehicle crashes. So where are all of the marches, and media coverage about these terrible roadway tragedies happening daily? Told'ya that you didn't want to hear it.... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/5/2019)
|
| No. Go away. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
