|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/18/2019)
|
Idiots.
A mass shooter on a mission will carry as many magazines as he can, with minimum interruption on reloads.
On bread, in cooking, no difference. |
| Comment by:
RichardJCoon
(10/18/2019)
|
| I really don't see a ban working..... I can't envision a line of potential mass shooters waiting patiently to turn in the "large capacity" (or standard if your educated) magazines. All grumbling about having to change magazines now.... |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/18/2019)
|
The Virginia Tech shooter, Cho, used two handguns, one a .22, and killed about 3 dozen people.
The Mary Stoneman Douglas High School shooter, on 2.14.18, used a AR-15 with a bag full of TEN ROUND MAGAZINES to murder with.
Do libtards find the # of victims in THESE events acceptable?
No?
Neither do I.
But magazine bans will not work....
and the fact remains, THEY WANT OUR GUNS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
