|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NV: Big names behind effort to strengthen Nevada gun laws
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Some big names in Southern Nevada are supporting an initiative aimed at closing what they call a loophole in state regulations governing firearms purchases.
Wynn Resorts cofounder Elaine Wynn, former Clark County Sheriff Bill Young and former Las Vegas Mayor Jan Jones Blackhurst have been named as board members of Nevadans for Background Checks. The advisory board is pushing an initiative that could appear on the 2016 ballot.
Under Nevada law, a background check is required for guns purchased from licensed dealers but not purchases from private sellers or those made at gun shows. |
Comment by:
lostone1413
(1/21/2015)
|
This is all being carried out by Bloomberg and Gates Two of the most evil people in the world The same ones pushing a one world government |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|