|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Guns, Guns, Everywhere – Except at GOP Presidential Candidate Functions – No Guns Allowed — A**wipe Hypocrites
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Republican presidential debate was made into a “gun free” zone, much to the dismay of staunch pro-gun conservatives, reported Salon. Several of the candidates have taken pro-gun stances, but the “gun free” policy at the debate last night proves that preaching the Second Amendment is just a tactic to win votes.
Cleveland’s Quicken Loans Arena has a firm no-gun policy that also applies to people with concealed carry permits. It’s too dangerous to allow firearms inside of a large venue that holds thousands of people. When a representative of St. Anselm College was asked whether guns would be allowed during its hosting of the GOP debate next February, the representative said “absolutely not.” |
| Comment by:
laker1
(8/8/2015)
|
| There were plenty of RINO's on stage and off including the Fox News Crew that would support No Gun Zones. The proven most dangerous place for mass killings. What do they want more no gun zones thus more killings. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/8/2015)
|
“ 'Stand Your Ground' laws that played a role in the shooting deaths of Trayvon Martin"
A lie.
"such a plan would bring greater danger to soldiers."
Another lie, albeit by the perfumed-prince generals, not the author of the article.
The main thrust is cogent, however. The GOP hypocrisy is palpable. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
