|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
xqqme
(10/26/2016)
|
Are they going to destroy all of the cars, boats, money, and other valuable items seized from criminals? These things, too, if used in criminal acts, should be treated EXACTLY the same way that the NYPD treats guns used. Right?
Or should a valuable, lawful, and dare I say it, Constitutionally protected item, be destroyed merely because it was once used to facilitate a criminal act instead of being sold and the proceeds used to benefit society or the victims? |
| Comment by:
laker1
(10/26/2016)
|
| Destruction of public property. Isn't that a crime? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.— Benjamin Franklin Historical Review of Pennsylvania. [Note: This sentence was often quoted in the Revolutionary period. It occurs even so early as November, 1755, in an answer by the Assembly of Pennsylvania to the Governor, and forms the motto of Franklin's "Historical Review," 1759, appearing also in the body of the work. — Frothingham: Rise of the Republic of the United States, p. 413. ] |
|
|
