|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Ted Cruz: What the Times Doesn’t Get about the Second Amendment
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"On Friday, the New York Times stated, in a blaring headline, that my support for Second Amendment rights is 'strange.'"
"In particular, the writer took issue with my statement that 'the Second Amendment to the Constitution isn’t for just protecting hunting rights, and it’s not only to safeguard your right to target practice. It is a constitutional right to protect your children, your family, your home, our lives, and to serve as the ultimate check against governmental tyranny — for the protection of liberty.'"
"In addition to 'strange,' the NYT described this view as 'ridiculous,' 'silly,' and 'absurd' (methinks the Old Gray Lady doth protest too much)." ... |
| Comment by:
-none-
(4/20/2015)
|
lindsay graham doesn't get it either...on fox sunday with chris wallace saying the (very) last option for a populace is an informed electorate rather than, as Cruz stated, the 2A ...which lindsay characterizes as "people coming out on the streets with guns to solve problems"...his claim to want to run was the most halfhearted attempt at explanation ever seen, as if he thinks it's a joke, and 'he still has to assemble/arrange a platform/action plan'.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
