|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
A gun owner for gun sanity
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
You might need an assault rifle for self-defense, but that would be defense against your own fantasies; you won’t be attacked by a horde of lawless intruders. Otherwise, it’s more likely that someone in your family will commit suicide with it, kill someone accidentally, or, in the case of Sandy Hook Elementary, kill a whole classroom of first-graders. Twenty children who will never have another peanut butter and jelly sandwich or another birthday. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(4/13/2018)
|
Bunch of lies. There are what....8 million ARS out there, and only a handful are used in mass shootings. Actually more mass shootings are done with handguns.
There have NOT been 8,000,000 +1 mass shootings out there, bozo. That's the only way what you said could be true. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] |
|
|
