|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MD: Salisbury To Ban Replica Guns To Protect Youth
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Salisbury officials are considering a ban on toys and BB guns that look like real weapons. They feel this will aid in preventing the type of shootings that have taken place across the country. Officials met today at Salisbury city hall to address a number of issues including a ban on replica guns to protect children. There have been a number of instances where police officers have approached children and they have appeared to have a real gun which resulted in the child being wounded, sometimes fatally.
|
| Comment by:
jac
(9/27/2016)
|
I have never heard of a problem with replica guns except for miscreants in democratic controlled cities.
Make replica guns illegal and they will use real guns instead. This is another example where the guns are not the problem. It is the gang mentality and lack of fathers that is the problem.
I would suggest that they are better off allowing the replica guns. That way it is only the miscreants that are harmed. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(9/27/2016)
|
1. Teach your kids not to 'shoot' at strangers.
2. Teach your cops not to murder people who aren't threatening to murder anybody else.
3. Problem solved. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
