|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
PA: Teachers with guns? Senate Bill 383 gives OK in Pa.
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
State Sen. Don White wants to give school districts more options to keep students safe.
But according to several statewide education groups, allowing teachers to carry firearms on school property is not a viable option.
The Indiana County Republican's Senate Bill 383 — it was approved this week by a 9-3 vote of the bipartisan Senate Education Committee — would allow school districts to grant properly licensed and trained personnel access to firearms or permission to carry a concealed firearm. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/23/2017)
|
All opposition to the lawful carry of concealed sidearms by vetted, licensed people is knee-jerk in nature, based upon "what if's" and not on empirical evidence. As a matter of fact, what evidence does exist in this regard demonstrates exactly the reverse of their contentions.
Making policy and laws based upon emotions instead of evidence does not serve anyone well. Not the children nor the parents, not the schools, not the staff and administration, not the community, not anyone.
One does not have to be a police officer to recognize someone shooting at people. One does not have to be a police officer to enjoy the fundamental right to self-defense and the defense of other innocents. Apprehending a shooter isn't the object, stopping him is. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
