|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IL: Chicago cop indicted in beating will remain on leave
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"A Chicago cop accused of punching and kicking a convenience store worker and lying about it won’t lose his job before he gets his day in court, it appears."
"Aldo Brown, a 12-year veteran accused by the feds in November of attacking a worker in 2012 at the Omar Salma convenience store on East 76th Street, asked a judge last week to lift a restriction that prevents him from carrying a weapon while awaiting trial."
"Without the ability to carry a gun, he said he feared the Chicago Police Department might fire him. And his defense attorney, Daniel Herbert, said that would have 'devastated' his client — even if Brown were to be acquitted at trial." ... |
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(7/14/2015)
|
| To serve and protect What a Joke! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
