|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/18/2018)
|
Patriot Prayer: "I-1639 is a totalitarian crackdown on our Second Amendment rights."
Snowflake students, covering their ears and running around in circles: "LALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALAAAA" |
| Comment by:
-none-
(10/18/2018)
|
PP is thoroughly disowned by RNC. Medved and Ben Sasse were just talking about them and antifa as "reilly weird", highlighting to larger points which Sasse discusses in his book "Them: Why We Hate Each Other--and How to Heal", which discusses the polarization in age of social media, loneliness epidemic, propensity to take sides (D or R) to be on a team for this sense of community ("it doesn't work that way"), the 50% reduction of friends on average since 1990 amidst the general population, the trend toward robots as supposedly "viable" human replacements, etc.
"Win the battle, lose the war" seems the term of the day for both sides, to what end, what positive change do they seek, what can be accomplished by tit for tat assaults ?
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
