
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MN: A foreign view: our fascination with guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Down under in the South Pacific lies an English-speaking island nation called New Zealand. It’s much like America, with some tropics, snow-capped mountains, rolling green hills speckled with sheep, waterfalls, rain forests, and thousands of miles of sandy beaches. With three major cities, Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, it has urban and rural problems like America—but how they view criminal justice is vastly different. Their country was settled by Europeans in the 1840’s. Their history wasn’t a “shoot it out” conquest of their natives, the Maori; instead they settled into a reasonable, peaceful co-existence that remains to this day.
|
Comment by:
teebonicus
(6/19/2015)
|
"If America’s gun owners claim they are responsible, then they should prove their responsibility by accepting gun registration laws like New Zealand.”
Have you ever read anything MORE ridiculous in your LIFE?
Translation: If Americans want to prove that they are responsible enough to be free, they should give up their freedom to prove that they are responsible.
It's appropriate that they call themselves Kiwis, because that concept is the most bird-brained thing I've ever heard. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|