|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
What THE PUNISHER Teaches Us About Gun Control
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I don’t think THE PUNISHER pulled any punches on showing the uglier sides of gun control debate. Why should it, when this is the same show that shows us people facing brutalization by bullets nearly every single episode? THE PUNISHER covers the parts of gun control that aren’t so black-and-white. From reasons why someone who is purportedly anti-gun would have a concealed carry permit to why average citizens might turn to pro-gun ideas in our society. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/16/2017)
|
Since it is a given that gun control (not “gun safety”) advocates’ goal is the literal elimination of the fundamental liberty of private citizens to bear arms, there is no ‘discussion’ to be had.
Shut them down every time they open their anti-American ‘progressive’ mouths. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
