|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: Gun enthusiast destroys assault rifle in wake of mass shootings
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A gun enthusiast from southern California says he is taking a step to help destroy gun violence.
One of Chad Vachter’s prized possessions was a thousand-dollar AR-15 assault rifle. After seeing the growing number of mass shootings in the country, Vachter said he was fed up and decided to take a hammer to his gun, destroying it.
“I can’t do it,” he said. “I can’t have something in my house that so easily could become a part of another situation like that, and I’m not going to be desensitized to it. I refuse to.” |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/18/2017)
|
Destroy your $$$$$$$, you fool. Your rifle. We're YOU going to take it and do a mass shooting?
No?
Nothing has changed.
Oh wait, you're out one $1,000.00 dollar rifle. Idiot... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/18/2017)
|
Oh MY yes! We all must DO something!
[eyeroll] |
| Comment by:
mickey
(11/18/2017)
|
Gun Control Enthusiast Destroys AR15 in Publicity Stunt.
FIFY. |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(11/19/2017)
|
So, none of this "enthusiast"'s other firearms can kill ?
You just can't fix stupid. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
