|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Second Amendment must change with the times
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It's way past time to modernize the Second Amendment. Yes people kill people; guns don't kill people. But guns don’t go off by themselves.
Guns in the hands of people are dangerous, even in the hands of people who are trained in their use. I'm certainly not advocating disarming the police. However, the recent killing of a Dallas, Texas individual in his own apartment by a policewoman is just the most recent demonstration how things can go wrong concerning guns.
Ed.: Third story on page. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/20/2018)
|
This guy believes that the government can guarantee your safety, therefore, we don't need the second amendment.
He must live in a bubble. People are assaulted, raped and murdered every day.
The only people that believe that we don't need the second amendment are liberals, kooks, and the much fewer then a million morons.
I for one would keep the second amendment as it was originally intended, not as the liberals have already eviscerated it.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/20/2018)
|
| Kool Aid drinker. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
