|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Big Government Can’t Fight Terrorism at Home
Submitted by:
Rob Morse
Website: http://slowfacts.wordpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Both French and US government officials spoke again about terrorism. Again they proposed to disarm innocent citizens. They said the government would protect citizens from terrorists .. given enough time. We’ve seen the casualty count from that failed idea.
We’ve also seen how armed citizens succeed and stop mass murder again and again. Citizens will have to protect themselves without waiting for government help .. and they can. |
| Comment by:
Uncommon1
(4/26/2016)
|
| Eventually. Nice word. That means every time some nasty goat raping savage wants to go ballistic, the government will come in after the fact and say "Yes, this looks like a case of terrorism." In the meantime, another two dozen innocent American citizens have been murdered for no other reason than the fact they aren't worshipers of the pedophile prophet. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
