|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
KS: Bollier supports gun rights and advocates for safety
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Her support of basic gun safety doesn’t cause me to waver in my support of her campaign one bit.
I also respect that Barbara approaches this issue as a physician. She knows we can protect the rights of gun owners while also protecting the health and safety of our communities. I know she’s a thoughtful, moderate leader who is committed to finding solutions that protect our rights, keeps us safe and keeps guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/23/2020)
|
Bollier is a Democrat, which is disqualifying.
A Marshall loss would add a Democrat to the Senate.
No. Not even. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|