|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
GA: Savannah church members speak out against gun violence, promote firearm awareness
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Last Wednesday, 19 orange ribbons were hung on the gate outside Asbury Memorial United Methodist Church, representing the 19 people killed by firearms in Savannah since Jan. 1."
"The lighter-colored ribbons, of which there were three, represent the victims who were younger than 18."
"Sunday, the list of names was read and a bell was again rung for each of the victims. Then, church member Anne Allen Westbrook was asked to speak about gun violence in Savannah, as a representative of the Savannah chapter of Moms Demand Action ..." ...
"One of the ways Westbrook said that people can help prevent the unacceptable loss of life is through education and making gun storage a common question for parents and children to ask about." ... |
| Comment by:
-none-
(7/6/2015)
|
| the sikh temple wisconsin members led the pack in towing the gun control line and this is more race pimping....am getting rather cynical by now about (many aspects of) organized religion....methodist one of the top liberal offenders, with presbyterian, catholic, etc. "They" say trust in G-d rather than bring a gun into The House Of G-d ("He helps those who help themselves"), but here they're obviously not trusting in G-d and pushing gun control. You can't have it both ways....hypocrisy. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
