|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
kangpc
(9/3/2016)
|
Two sociologists get together for a conversation and decide to revive this dead horse and beat on it some more.
The inherent human right to keep and bear arms is enshrined in and protected by the Second Amendment to our Constitution.
Driving a vehicle on the public roads is generally accepted to be a privilege subject to state control.
But just as every valid driver's license issued in our country is accepted as legitimate by every state, so too must every weapons permit issued in this country be recognized by every state.
Otherwise our federal system begins to crumble and collapse.
So let the politically driven sociologists retreat to their cave and continue their verbal onanism. But pay them no heed. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/4/2016)
|
Sounds reasonable.
You don't need a drivers license or background check to buy an automobile.
You do not need a driver's license unless you want to drive said vehicle on public roads.
You do not have to license or register a vehicle unless you want to drive it on public roads.
A drivers license is valid in all 50 states.
You can buy a car if you are a convicted felon.
There are no restrictions on horsepower or how fast a car can go. Therefore, there should be no limits on automatic weapons. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
