
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: Gov. Evers Continues To Push For New Gun Laws
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Gov. Tony Evers said Tuesday he wants new laws on guns, but his proposals aren't what some Republicans have suggested. "My goal is to work on two things we know the people of Wisconsin want: universal background checks and making sure that people that are struggling with mental issues and are deemed to be dangerous by a court of law have their guns temporarily taken away from them," Evers said. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/25/2019)
|
All Americans MUST learn this life-lesson: DEMOCRATS ARE STINK!!!
There is one thing you can take to the bank: Anything any Democrat proposes is fatally stinky, by default. Democrats think that the Bill of Rights is a list of suggestions; they are commands.
But Democrats don't accept that. Therefore, ergo and hence (comma), all Democrat-proposed bills are automatically suspect, and likely have stank irreparably built-in. |
Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(9/25/2019)
|
that is a lie, residents in the majority do not want more gun control...the Gov. is trying to push his gun control agenda. any poll he states is a made up poll which makes it a lie. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|