|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(8/5/2019)
|
| Well now let's see. Trying to prove your worth as an elected servant, by throwing in the towel on making criminals obey laws, by attempting to make someone else who has done nothing wrong, take responsibility for those criminal activities, sounds like criminal activity in itself. Rights are supposed to be served up by the state, not suppressed by it.....Pathetic.... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/5/2019)
|
| Wadda PATRIOT! You've heard of falling on one's sword for 'the cause'? Well, Mitch fell on his SHOULDER, breaking it and ruining Pelosi's blood-dancing plans for gun control in August! |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/5/2019)
|
"Congressman Eric Swalwell said it's time to ban and buy back high powered rifles. "We are seeing two problems intersect. The rise of white nationalism in American and unrestricted weaponry."
Stupid ass just shows his ignorance. 6.5 mm NATO is not a high powered rifle. Or maybe his agenda goes beyond confiscation of magazine fed rifles. |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/5/2019)
|
"He has blood on his hands," said DeSaulnier. "He knows what he's saying is hateful, he knows it's divisive. He's the first president that I can remember that has been deliberately divisive in trying to drag people apart."
Democrats are quick to ignore Obama's divisive actions. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
