|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Australia: Can you really print a gun at home?
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
How authorities monitor the spread of unauthorised weapons has become more complicated as technology enables new manufacturing methods.
The manufacture of guns using three dimensional (3D) printing technology has been a growing concern to law enforcement authorities since the first plastic 3D-printed gun was successfully fired in Texas in May 2013.
3D printing of the first metal gun was reported in California six months later. The gun successfully fired at least 50 rounds. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(5/26/2015)
|
News for you authoritarians Dewn Undah:
Where there's a will, there's a way, and you CANNOT keep liberty down. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
