|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
LA: Muslims Targeted in Threats By Gun Hoarder? ‘I’ll kill you!’
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A 40-year-old Agoura Hills man is facing charges of making criminal threats against the Islamic Center of Southern California. Los Angeles police announced Tuesday. Mark Lucian Feigin allegedly called the mosque on Sept. 20 and threatened to kill a staff member, said Cmdr. Horace Frank, of the LAPD’s Counter Terrorism and Special Operations Bureau. Police serving a search warrant on Feigin’s home found a large cache of weapons — some registered to the defendant — plus thousands of rounds of ammunition and an illegally modified clip, Frank said. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/26/2016)
|
| Maybe the heading should read L.A. for Los Angeles (or just plain CA for Commiefornia), and LA for Louisiana? |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/27/2016)
|
He said "I'll KEEL you!"?
That was Ahmed the Dead Terrorist.
An' he's a Muslim. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
