|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IL: Stop Congress from trashing Illinois’ concealed gun protections
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The people who think the Second Amendment phrase “well-regulated” means “not regulated at all” are back.
This time, they’re pushing a dangerous idea called “concealed carry reciprocity” that would allow people who get concealed gun carry permits in states that have absolutely no restrictions to carry those hidden, loaded guns anywhere in the country.
That means a state such as Illinois could no longer draw a line and refuse to give concealed carry permits to people convicted of violent misdemeanors, substance abusers, repeat drunken drivers or who have severe mental health issues. |
| Comment by:
KMBRTAC45
(4/18/2017)
|
I'm no genius, but I think this could be a moot point with just a simple fix: The concealed carriers permit must match their drivers license.
The problem comes when states make it too difficult whether by cost or the standards of "may issue" being too high. ALL states should be shall issue for a realistic cost. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/18/2017)
|
As is typical, there is no comments section.
The first sentence in this piece is prima facie evidence that the author is a brainwashed tool of the anti-gun left, and is sadly lacking in English grammar and usage.
The term "well-regulated" modifies the noun, "militia", not the noun, "right" nor the noun, "people".
There is no way the 2A can be read to regulate the right; AAMOF, it prohibits regulation of the right, black-letter. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(4/18/2017)
|
| Wel regulated in the 2A means well trained, not todays term regulated as in laws!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
