|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
laker1
(6/23/2016)
|
| Many liberals believe in the freedom of sugary drinks and pies. Ref: Michael Moore. |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/23/2016)
|
That would be fine with me. No more 4473 forms.
|
| Comment by:
hisself
(6/23/2016)
|
| I will NEVER willingly give up my rights in any areas! |
| Comment by:
PP9
(6/23/2016)
|
Ok, sure.
Sugary drinks-- legal to purchase and possess by everyone, including children and felons. No background check, no ID checked, no forms to fill out, no permit needed to own or carry anywhere in the country, including into government buildings, and no restrictions on methods of storage. No registration of any kind, nor are any records kept of the purchase. No limits on number purchased per unit of time.
Cigarettes-- all of the same except that they are not legal for children, and ID will sometimes be required to substantiate that.
So yeah, if the left wants to restrict it so that McDonald's can only lawfully sell certain sizes of guns with no ID or paperwork out of the drive-thru window in New York City, that would be fine.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
