|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CT: No-fly list gun restriction makes sense
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In announcing his plan to sign an executive order that would deny issuance of gun permits to individuals on the U.S. government's “no-fly” list, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy is once again positioning himself, and so Connecticut, as a leader in pursuing sensible gun restriction policies. And what could be more sensible than denying a person, judged so risky that he cannot get on an airplane, access to a deadly weapon?
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/12/2015)
|
| Apparently, the writer has no clue about the 5th Amendment. |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(12/12/2015)
|
"judged" by who ? Not actually adjudicated, so guilty until proven innocent ? Welcome to Amerika !
I'm sure some antigun government official would like to place the entire membership of the NRA on the watch list that nobody knows why they're on. Apply it to foreign nationals if you want to, but US citizens are SUPPOSED to have some rights !! |
| Comment by:
laker1
(12/12/2015)
|
| Publish the names on the no fly list. What is the secret? Maybe lawsuits for denial of due process? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
