|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/4/2017)
|
A bunch of twaddle! Chicago still has strict gun laws, and few if any gunstores. The libs are still whining about guns being smuggled in from nearby areas. Why aren't those areas just as violent as Chicago if the guns are the problem? Society is COLLAPSING in Chicago....gang violence, drugs, spurred by collapsing family structure feed this vicious cycle. Banning guns will not help. Chicago must heal itself and it's leaders ought to stop whining for more ineffective gun laws. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/4/2017)
|
Note that this idiot's only lament is that the SCOTUS forced Chitown to obey the Constitution.
Hmnph. Obey the Constitution. Imagine THAT! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|