|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
A Purse Is No Place for a Gun
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In New York last month the glitterati descended on Manhattan for its annual Fashion Week. A week later in Fayetteville, North Carolina, some highly specialized designs were showcased on a much smaller runway.
A women’s shooting group called the Gun Powder Gals hosted a fashion show at a local VFW post that featured bra holsters, corset holsters, and thigh holsters. Such fashion shows have recently popped up in other states, seemingly in response to a reported spike in women buying guns for self-defense and sport.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/13/2015)
|
Someone could drop a purse and the gun would "go off"?
Please.
Relying on that asinine "Mike The Gun Guy" isn't conducive to a rational thought process. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
