|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(3/17/2026)
|
Nice pipe dream Dave Workman but the atf is a terrorist entity that should NEVER get a "director" confirmed.
Did any senator ask Cekada about Adamiak during confirmation? Why not? Wait, has Cekada even HAD a confirmation hearing? Why did you leave this out and speak about him as if he is already confirmed, which confuses the reader? You even refer to him as "Director Cekada." Why? ATF's wikipedia page has no mention of him whatsoever. What is going on here?
Cekada being a "career" ATF guy is NOT a good thing. That means he's deep state. He's part of the illegal registry and the terrorism activities of the atf, which include false charges. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(3/17/2026)
|
Ok so I had to do multiple google searches to figure out what is going on with Robert Cekada who Dave Workman falsely labels as "director" and is nowhere to be found on the terrorist atf's wikipedia page for some reason.
Robert Cekada has only received a hearing by the senate judiciary committee on March 5th and sadly advanced out of a gutless/cowardly/stupid committee by a vote of 14-8 (14 bad votes, none of whom apparently asked one word about Patrick Adamiak during the hearing). |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| You are bound to meet misfortune if you are unarmed because, among other reasons, people despise you....There is simply no comparison between a man who is armed and one who is not. It is unreasonable to expect that an armed man should obey one who is unarmed, or that an unarmed man should remain safe and secure when his servants are armed. In the latter case, there will be suspicion on the one hand and contempt on the other, making cooperation impossible. — Niccolo Machiavelli in "The Prince." |
|
|
