|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Chicago: No Moratorium on Murder Even on Mother’s Day
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Five days after Chicago resident Nortasha Stingley pleaded for a Mother’s Day ceasefire in the Windy City, her request was answered with a new body count, with six dead and more than 20 others wounded, according to various reports.
As noted at the popular Heyjackass.com website, Chicago has seen more than 200 people murdered so far this year, the bulk of them killed by gunfire. So far in May, at this writing, nearly 20 people have died from criminal violence, not all of them shot.
|
| Comment by:
punch
(5/11/2021)
|
| Hey KABA IT person: Navigating from page to page is painfully slow. I am using a 2 Gb line yet access is as if I am using 56k modem. I mean this can take 1/2 minute or more for a page to materialize. It wasn't always like this but now it is so painfully slow that I often time bail out of this website. Please fix this. I will repeat this post multiple times in hopes you read this and fix this. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
