|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
kangpc
(10/17/2016)
|
Chillary is setting herself up to outdo O'Bummer as firearms salesperson of the decade.
(It's good the judge is a woman.) |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/17/2016)
|
What is "incomprehensible" is that ANYONE would believe that gunmakers should be held responsible for criminal misuse of stolen guns.
This country is going batshit crazy, and Hillary Clinton's ascension to presidential contender and likely next president is a symptom of a fatal disease. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/17/2016)
|
| Anybody else think it's incomprehensible that this vile carpetbagger was elected Senator from NY, let alone nominated to the presidency? |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(10/17/2016)
|
| Not a surprising position for someone that also finds security protocols, her security briefings and the meaning of "C" in a document header "incomprehensible" ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
