|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(6/3/2015)
|
| Hey, if Whoraldo is that upset, Vince has done a Goodness Thing. |
| Comment by:
jughead
(6/4/2015)
|
| cant post what i think of geraldo. change channels every time he comes on. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(6/4/2015)
|
I was actually watching that segment and changed the channel when I saw jerry rivers...to be fair, I did listen long enough to be disgusted, which actually took a few minutes because he wasn't saying anything, but when he actually did it was hostile bs-vitriol. So I missed all of the **** and had to come back to breitbart for an update. When The Five allow a host in the actual employ of Fox News to purport lies, even when he is rebuffed, it damages the brand of the the show segment as well as the hosting channel.
"Geraldo later denied that guns are used by law-abiding citizens to stop crimes. He asked fellow host Eric Bolling, “When was the last time you heard of a civilian stopping a crime with a gun?” And when Bolling said, “It happens |
| Comment by:
-none-
(6/4/2015)
|
thousands of times per day,” Geraldo responded by saying, “That’s a legend. You’re watching too much True Detective.”
The number Bolling was looking for was 2,082 defensive gun uses (DGUs) per day. That number comes from Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck’s scholarly work showing a minimum of 760,000 DGUs a year." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
