|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NM: NRA just isn't what it used to be
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
LaPierre’s scenario ranks right up there with the Zombie Apocalypse in urgency and credibility.
Nobody from the left or right is coming for your guns. Some think access to military-style weapons should be reserved for combat by trained soldiers, but no one plans to take away yours, not that they would object if you chose to give it up on your own,.
The Second Amendment proclaims the necessity of a “well-regulated militia,” not an undisciplined mob with excessive firepower controlled only by individual whim. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/9/2021)
|
While the author has a point about Wayne, his assumptions are illogical, given the evidence.
Folks at the center of 2A opposition have made no secret that they wish to disarm the citizenry.
Obama himself said, "I don't think that people should be allowed to have guns."
So stuff a sock in it, Steve. With Fudds like you we don't need enemies. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
