|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(6/17/2016)
|
National Propaganda Radio from Boston.
|
| Comment by:
PP9
(6/17/2016)
|
How can there be racist comments against Muslims when Muslim is not a race? It's an ideology of world domination and killing. The left has no trouble denouncing our ideology of government that leaves you alone, but to denounce one whose "holy" book tells them to kill us is bad?
Of course not all Muslims are terrorists. Those that believe what is in the Koran and are prepared to act on it are, though. The so-called moderate Muslim is a Muslim in the same sense that Nancy Pelosi is a Catholic. She considers it part of her identity and heritage, but doesn't actually concern herself with the tenets of the religion. It's easy to be Catholic if you just claim it and do whatever you want anyway. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(6/19/2016)
|
| Someone tell this idiot to read the Bill Of Rights and all of the debates about them. May be he will find it IS about military style arms ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
