|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(4/4/2018)
|
BB gun? Really? A guy can't buy a BB GUN?!
This country has gone insane. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/4/2018)
|
Baloney.
What folks either are ignorant of or refuse to accept is that U.S. v. Miller stands as a prohibition on banning whole classes of arms "in common use" that have a "reasonable relationship to the efficiency" of a militia.
Eventually, the SCOTUS will have to take a case, and if stare decisis means anything, acknowledge that Miller and Heller have already decided this issue. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
