
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
PA: A modest proposal on guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Here is an example of a regulation that could provide an effective compromise. If individuals want to own semi-automatic assault weapons, either as collectors or for practice shooting, then enforce a provision that such weapons can only be kept at legally registered shooting ranges or other registered depositories, and cannot be removed from the designated premises.
Similarly, if individuals want to use unusual high-powered weapons for hunting, and if such weapons are deemed to be acceptable for hunting purposes, then require that the hunters collect their weapons from a registered hunting depot and redeposit them after hunting, with the guns and ammunition properly accounted for. |
Comment by:
hisself
(10/17/2017)
|
You would deprive me of my God given right (ensured by the Second Amendment) to keep and bear arms, and you call it a 'modest proposal'?
|
Comment by:
dasing
(10/17/2017)
|
NEVER happen!!!! |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/17/2017)
|
I say we "deposit" the parts made of lead first!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Comment by:
GR8dowbay
(10/18/2017)
|
THIS MORON HITS ON SO MANY ANTIQUATED, 'OUTDATED', 'OUTMODED', WORN-DOWN, LIB-SOCIALIST TALKING POINTS...
I WOULDNT EVEN KNOW WHERE TO START!! THE ENTIRE ARTICLE: TRIPE. GARBAGE. i.e. TOTALLY DISREGARD! NO RELEVANCE IN ANYTHING HE SAYS.
GLAD HE FOUND SOME DA##ED-GOOD WEED, THO! ...MORON.
---next. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|