|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CO: Gun debate illustrates lack of core values
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The recent controversy with state Sen. Kerry Donovan raises many questions about beliefs around guns. As Mick Ireland wrote, Donovan is likely to lose her next election no matter how she votes on large gun magazines. He also mentions the belief by many conservatives that their guns will protect them from losing their liberty to a totalitarian government. As usual, the Democrat has caved in, and Democrats in general have been out-messaged with propaganda."
"I personally warned Sen. Mark Udall that the Democrats lacked 'identity and narrative.' His campaign addressed neither and he lost. National Democrats have now figured this out. They are going to try to fix it. ..." ... |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(2/25/2015)
|
"The Second Amendment only guarantees that states may have militias."
Color Patrick clueless.
It guarantees that states have armed populations that they can call up for militia duty.
That is PRECISELY what it says.
Despite the historical exegeses written by the SCOTUS, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, all of which were independent analyses of the history of the Second Amendment yet were in 100% agreement, this yokel et al parrot that inane statement.
Why don't they just GO AWAY? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
