
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Sheryl Crow's Criticism of Country Artists on Gun Control Is Missing Something
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Sheryl Crow says no one in the popular country music world is willing to speak up for gun control. She's not totally right.
The singer seemed to be talking in general terms when she told the Guardian that she's been disappointed with the response from country musicians on gun control, especially after the Route 91 Harvest Festival shooting in Las Vegas.
"You would think after Vegas we would see some leadership from our country community,” she says in an interview published on Tuesday (Dec. 12), "But all I can say about that is if there’s money involved, and fear, these conversations come to a screeching halt." |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/15/2017)
|
Sheryl Crow is a liftist dork.
("dorkette"?) |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/15/2017)
|
(Oops! "leftist", not "liftist".) |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|