
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
jac
(7/8/2016)
|
I suppose that the anti-gun liberals will be calling for a ban on our deer rifles now.
They may finally figure out that you don't need a semi automatic AR-15 to kill several people.
Oh, silly me. I forgot that their ultimate goal is to confiscate all guns. |
Comment by:
jughead
(7/8/2016)
|
never let a crisis got to waste. my reply will always be NO MORE COMPROMISE |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/8/2016)
|
"powerful guns"
Oh, you mean like THIS...?
http://loadoutroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Winchestermodel70_620x350_2.jpg |
Comment by:
BLAADE
(7/8/2016)
|
'THEY' KNOW! Despite their BEST PLANS (and we all know they DO have EXTREMELY RUTHLESS, blood-thirsty plans for our ...elimination) -
They know it SURRRRE WOULD MAKE IT EASIER -DAMMIT- IF THEY COULD JUST GET RID OF OUR DAMM GUNS!! : /
haha... KEEP UR POWDER DRY. WE'RE CLOSE. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|