| 
            
              | 
 | 
                
                
                  
                    | 
                              
                                   
                                        | 
                              
                              
                              NOTE! 
                               
                              This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
                      free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
                      Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
                      reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
                      any other living person besides the one who posted them.
                      Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
                              comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
                              Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
                              bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
                              other small-minded people.  Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
                              
                              
                                         |  
                         
                         The
                      Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
                         
                                       
                                            
                      
     
  
    | Court: Cops have the right to frisk everyone Submitted by: 
			
Mark A. Taff
 Website: http://www.marktaff.com
 | 
			There 
				are 2  comments 
			 	on this storyPost Comments | Read Comments
 |  
    | A Federal appeals court this week ruled that police officers are justified in frisking anyone they believe may have a weapon during a traffic stop without regard for whether the individual is legally armed.
 
 The U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with a lower court in a 58-page ruling determining that officer safety should always trump personal privacy and the right to self defense.
 |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     dasing
     (1/27/2017) |  
    | And, if they DON'T have probable cause, we can sue. That might give them a thought to ponder!! |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     PHORTO
     (1/27/2017) |  
    | Wrong, dasing. 
 This is ancient news.
 
 [Wikipedia] Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."[1]
 
 It's called a "Terry Stop", and it has been legal precedent since 1968.
 |  
 
 |  |  
              | QUOTES
                TO REMEMBER |  
              | 
                    
                      | These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of men and women.  — Thomas Paine, The Crisis, Intro. (Dec. 1776). |  |  |