|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Proposal Would Allow Deadly Weapons in Missouri Capitol
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Parents of children who may be looking forward to a field trip to the Missouri Capitol in Jefferson City next year should be aware that, under a proposed new rule, individuals with concealed-carry permits would be allowed to bring firearms into the Capitol building. Thus, their children may be sharing hallways or visiting offices along with individuals carrying guns.
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(11/26/2018)
|
| Let's see now...All of these scary Concealed Handgun License holders have: "Passed" a criminal background check: Have "Never" been convicted of any drug offenses: Have "NO" felony convictions, but somehow, are still viewed as some kind of suspect. It's the criminals you have to worry about, not the law abiding. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
