|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Paul Muschick: ‘Ghost guns’ no Longer Above the Law in Pennsylvania
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
With lawmakers lacking the courage to take big steps, Pennsylvania’s top law enforcement officer did what he could on his own Monday to address gun violence. Attorney General Josh Shapiro issued a legal opinion classifying unfinished gun frames as firearms. That closes a big loophole in the law because felons who were prohibited from buying guns were able to buy partial frames at gun shows and online, and then build weapons.
|
| Comment by:
hisself
(12/17/2019)
|
Hey idiot! At what point does a block of aluminium become an unfinished firearm? Or, did you just declare anyone who owns a 3D printer or a milling machine a criminal?
What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
