|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Kasich Spits on the Second Amendment
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Heller decision, confirming that the Second Amendment acknowledges an individual right to keep and bear arms, written by the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia was in many respects the Roberts court’s finest hour.
In its acknowledgment that rights are inherent, not granted by government Heller is constitutional originalism at its finest and Scalia at his incisive and eloquent best. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(3/21/2016)
|
and he likes to cuss when he breaks the law: foxnews.com/politics/2011/02/17/kasich-earns-ire-public-safety-groups-calling-traffic-cop-idiot.html
ohio, a strange amalgam of liberalism-he is/was super popular w/ RINOs here in WA
-
youtube.com/watch?v=OVXBnz45cvA
Terror's New Weapon of Choice
Mar 16, 2016
Stones, knives, cars, and now guns. With shooting attacks on the rise, the IDF has uncovered many assembled weapons intended for terror.
"Every gun confiscated today, is a life saved tomorrow"....true with islum, and don't...shouldn't...slack on battlefield pressure, allows enemy buildup, but here we have Reform tikkun olam Rabbi's attending Hillary's events and dissing Trump, trying to pull a race card w/o their name or pic on it |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
