|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/26/2016)
|
| Prosecutors have discretion. They can decline to prosecute, regardless of the law. |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/26/2016)
|
This would have been completely legal in Texas.
Apparently, you cannot pursue and shoot someone in Colorado after the threat has been removed.
This being a suburb of Denver, the guy is probably toast. Outside of the greater Denver liberal enclave, he would probably find a sympathetic prosecutor, grand jury, and jury. |
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(1/26/2016)
|
| Must be a part of CO. that has been over run by transplants from the land of nuts and fruitcakes |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
