|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IN: Carlson murder trial jury tells judge it can't reach unanimous verdict
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 5 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Carlson, 46, and his lawyers say he acted in self-defense when he shot Acosta-Sanchez, 35, of Ramapo outside the home of one of Carlson's neighbors in Sparrowbush. Carlson's defense team is led by lawyers Benjamin Ostrer and Michael Mazzariello.
Acosta-Sanchez was wanted on a second-degree rape warrant and had eluded a police manhunt the day before the Oct. 11, 2013 shooting.
Prosecutors from the Westchester County District Attorney's Office say Carlson is a vigilante who took matters into his own hands, and got in over his head. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(11/5/2016)
|
| Sounds like at least one juror believes in dead rapists. |
| Comment by:
jac
(11/5/2016)
|
It's called jury nullification. Just don't mention that you even know the term. Judges in most states won't even allow talk about the concept but it is legal and part of established law.
They should give the defendant a medal instead of trying him for homicide. Sounds like he rid society of a PO S that didn't deserve the oxygen he was using.
Another concern of mine is that they charged him with second-degree murder, first-degree manslaughter and second-degree manslaughter. They do this so that it allows the majority of a jury to bully any holdouts into a compromise verdict. The prosecution should have to choose the charge they want to use and not offer the jury a choice. (Con't) |
| Comment by:
jac
(11/5/2016)
|
| It takes a strong individual to stick to his convictions when he is the lone holdout and subject to coercion by the other twelve. That is why hung juries are few and far between. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(11/6/2016)
|
Seems hard to convict:
"Ferrara said he peeked out a front window just as Carlson fired a second shot with his arms raised in classic shooting position, aiming - it seemed - for the center of mass. Acosta-Sanchez was reaching his right arm toward Carlson, so that his hand was maybe a foot from the gun barrel, Ferrara said.
"David was, in my opinion, off balance, backwards, backpedaling," Ferrara testified. "And Acosta-Sanchez - I can't say he was lunging or anything, but appeared to me to be in a position you would be in if you were reaching or lunging."
Acosta-Sanchez fell instantly, he said. "It wasn't a theatrical fall. It was a collapse." |
| Comment by:
mickey
(11/6/2016)
|
They charged him because he made the police look bad?
"One of Mr. Carlson’s lawyers, David Wallace, suggested on Friday that some sloppy police work may have contributed to Mr. Acosta-Sanchez’s death.
After learning of the warrant, Mr. Carlson called the Deerpark police, Mr. Wallace said, and set up a ruse. Mr. Carlson would take Mr. Acosta-Sanchez for a drive and the police would pull the car over for speeding.
The ruse worked, and Mr. Acosta-Sanchez was placed in a police car. But then, Mr. Wallace said, Mr. Acosta-Sanchez told officers that he needed his identification. They drove him to the cabin, he went inside and then he slipped away into the woods." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
