|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
If it comes down to Jeb v. Hillary, who do gun owners vote for?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"... [F]or Second Amendment activists, the question might boil down to this: If the choice is between Jeb and Hillary Rodham Clinton, who gets your vote?"
"Of course, there will be many a stubborn person who casts what has become known as a 'throw-away' protest vote for some third party, not-a-chance-in-hell candidate. In that case, election veterans will explain, it’s really a vote for Hillary. Every vote directed away from Bush is one handed to Hillary in that kind of a match and everybody with functioning gray matter knows it." ...
-------
Submitter's Note: Color me stubborn and stupid then, because I will forever refuse to vote for "the lesser of two evils." If the GOP wants my vote they will nominate someone with principles who will not just "work to protect" my 2A protected rights, but will actively work to repeal and remove unconstitutional laws and regulations which strangle those rights. |
| Comment by:
PDQ
(6/16/2015)
|
COLOR ME PRACTICAL.
Your attitude is how we got that idiot McAuliffe in VA |
| Comment by:
Mike the Limey
(6/16/2015)
|
It should be noted that had ALL the "other" votes been given to the Republicans in the last Presidential election, it still wouldn't have affected the outcome.
Vote for what you believe in, not the lesser of two evils, because doing the latter gets just that; a form of evil.
The greater the "protest vote", the greater the chance of change being brought about.
Look at the UK: In the 2015 General Election UKIP returned ONE MP with 12.6% of all votes cast but it's policies have suddenly become important to BOTH the major parties. |
| Comment by:
jdege
(6/16/2015)
|
For me, the deciding factor isn't so much what the candidate says, but who the candidate will appoint to his staff and cabinet positions.
And while I expect that Jeb would appoint some people I would find problematic, the people Hillary would appoint scares me silly. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. ~ Marcus Tullius Cicero (42B.C) |
|
|
