|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Second Amendment’s true intent
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 5 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The gun lobby and resultant extraordinary proliferation of guns, especially those designed and manufactured for mass killings of citizenry, could not have been anticipated by the framers of the Constitution. It makes no sense to deny that armament corporations and the gun lobby take ownership rights so far beyond the “original intent” it makes the Second Amendment to all intents and purposes unrecognizable. |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/25/2018)
|
It amazes me that some people are so smart that they know what the founding fathers intended.
Don't tell me that Thomas Jefferson could not have foreseen that armament technology would develop beyond the single shot flintlock.
Actually, the people that write and believe this garbage are a special kind of stupid. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(1/25/2018)
|
| People with this myopic view point should learn about American history, and our framers intents!!! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(1/25/2018)
|
| I'm sure that the author of this tripe would agree with restrictions on Internet communications, tv and radio communications, and twittering, be a use when the founders passed the First Amendment, there were no vacuum tubes, let alone silicon chips! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(1/25/2018)
|
| I'm sure that the author of this tripe would agree with restrictions on Internet communications, tv and radio communications, and twittering, because when the founders passed the First Amendment, there were no vacuum tubes, let alone silicon chips! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/25/2018)
|
There is no such thing as a "living Constitution"; the COUSA is inert, intended to carry immutable founding principles forward unaltered from its conception. It contains the means within to modify methods, but not principles.
A free people's liberty is validated by the fundamental right to defend themselves, individually and collectively (in that order), and to the means of exercising that right.
Period. |
|
|
